Limitless Energy Co. — Knowledge Base
0 to NTP Guide

Site Screening

Phase 1: Site Identification & Screening

The Pipeline Engine drives Limitless Energy's site identification and screening process. To date, Limitless has screened over 150 sites, advanced 15 to feasibility or beyond, and placed 4–5 sites under active control.

The screening process is designed to rapidly eliminate non-viable parcels and focus resources on sites with the highest probability of successful development.

Screening Criteria

1. FDNY Fatal-Flaw Screening

The most critical initial screen. Under 3 RCNY 608-01, outdoor stationary storage battery systems must satisfy stringent setback, exposure, ventilation, and access requirements. Key considerations:

  • Minimum setback distances from property lines, buildings, and occupied structures
  • Exposure analysis for adjacent structures within the required clearance zone
  • Emergency vehicle access and FDNY apparatus positioning requirements
  • Adequate space for required fire suppression infrastructure
  • Ventilation clearance for battery thermal management systems

A site that fails the FDNY fatal-flaw screen is eliminated immediately. No amount of engineering or capital can overcome a fundamentally non-compliant footprint.

2. Zoning Compatibility

Target zoning districts are M1, M2, and M3 manufacturing zones, which are generally permissible for utility infrastructure and energy storage installations. Key zoning considerations include:

  • Confirmation that BESS is a permitted or as-of-right use in the applicable zoning district
  • Special permit requirements, if any, for utility-scale energy storage
  • Overlay district restrictions (e.g., waterfront zones, flood zones, historic districts)
  • Variance requirements for setback encroachments or other non-conformities

3. Parcel Geometry & Size

The physical dimensions of the parcel must accommodate the Tesla Megapack system footprint plus all required setbacks, access lanes, and auxiliary equipment. A 5MW/20MWh Tesla Megapack installation typically requires:

  • Minimum usable area sufficient for battery container placement, pad-mounted transformer, switchgear, and meter
  • Adequate setback buffer zones per FDNY 3 RCNY 608-01 requirements
  • Emergency access lanes with minimum turning radius for fire apparatus
  • Space for construction staging during installation phase

4. Substation Proximity & Grid Access

Proximity to Con Edison distribution substations directly impacts interconnection cost, timeline, and feasibility:

  • Ideal sites are within 1–2 miles of a distribution substation with available hosting capacity
  • Longer interconnection distances increase cost (dedicated feeder construction) and timeline
  • Sites requiring transmission-level interconnection (typically >5MW) face substantially longer timelines and higher costs
  • Con Edison's hosting capacity maps should be consulted during initial screening

5. Hosting Capacity Analysis

Con Edison publishes hosting capacity data for its distribution system, indicating how much generation or storage can be interconnected at each point on the grid without triggering costly upgrades:

  • Sites on feeders with 5MW+ of available hosting capacity are preferred candidates
  • Feeders approaching capacity may require distribution upgrades, adding cost and timeline risk
  • Hosting capacity analysis should be refreshed regularly, as other developer applications can consume available capacity

6. Landlord Profile & Site Control Feasibility

Real estate fundamentals are as important as technical feasibility. Key landlord profile considerations:

  • Landlord willingness to execute long-term ground lease (20–25 year terms typical)
  • Property ownership structure (individual owner vs. institutional, estate, or partnership)
  • Existing encumbrances, liens, or competing use restrictions
  • Landlord sophistication and receptivity to infrastructure use education
  • Competitive landscape (other developers pursuing the same site)

Screening Outputs & Decision Gate

Sites that pass all six screening criteria are classified as qualified candidates and advanced to the feasibility stage. The Pipeline Engine produces:

  • Site screening scorecard with pass/fail on each criterion
  • Preliminary site map with setback overlay analysis
  • Hosting capacity snapshot from Con Edison data
  • Landlord contact information and initial outreach status
**Stage Gate 1: Site Screening Clearance**

>

Entry Criteria: Candidate parcel identified through Pipeline Engine

>

Exit Criteria: All six screening criteria passed; site classified as qualified candidate

>

Decision: Advance to Phase 2 (Site Control) or Eliminate

>

Approver: CEO (Daniel Gavrilov) and COO (Fei Gao)